Climate change

Climate change is a change in the pattern of weather, and related changes in oceans, land surfaces and ice sheets, occurring over time scales of decades or longer
If water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas, why all the fuss about CO2?

Water vapour accounts for about half the natural greenhouse effect. Its concentrations in the atmosphere are controlled mainly by atmospheric temperatures and winds, in contrast with the concentrations of other greenhouse gases which are directly influenced by human-induced inputs of these gases to the atmosphere. When global average atmospheric temperatures rise, global water vapour concentrations increase, amplifying the initial warming through an enhanced greenhouse effect. In this way, human activity leads indirectly to increases in water vapour concentrations.

The reality of the water vapour feedback is supported by recent observations and analyses. Increased water vapour concentrations have been observed and attributed to warming, and this feedback approximately doubles the sensitivity of climate to human activities.

Some recent changes in Australia’s climate are linked to rising greenhouse gases

Modelling studies indicate that rising greenhouse gases have made a clear contribution to the recent observed warming across Australia. Depletion of the ozone layer in the upper atmosphere over Antarctica and rising greenhouse gas concentrations are also likely to have contributed significantly to climate trends that have been observed in the Australian region over the past two decades. These include stronger westerly winds over the Southern Ocean, strengthening of the high-pressure ridge over southern Australia, and a related southward shift of weather systems. These trends are consistent with climate model projections, and are likely to be largely human-induced through a combination of increases in greenhouse gases and thinning of the ozone layer.

Past decadal trends in Australian rainfall (Question 2) cannot yet be clearly separated from natural climate variations, except in southwest Western Australia where a significant observed decline in rainfall has been attributed to human influences on the climate system.

There has very likely been net uptake of CO2 by Australian vegetation, consistent with global uptake of CO2 by vegetation on land (Figure 3.2). This has been accompanied by increases in the greenness of Australian vegetation, which is also consistent with global trends.

Our Simplistic version over what has happened in Victoria with fires and now storms
  • Bushfires caused by nature
  • massive water usage to try to extinguish the fires
  • creating steam pushed NW towards the Australian desert
  • continuing north gaining height then coming back SE  on top of normal weather patterns, creating high density cloud and as such floods
  • Under that theory  water get spread on fires, evaporates towards the NW and comes back as rain towards the SW, helping to extinguish the fires then the cycle repeats itself, as the fire reduces the travelling of water vapor decreases NW until the fie\re is stopped.
  What did we learn here
  1. for us how to use weather to create rainwater
  2. How it could be done, and where it will be more effective
  3. Alas, consequences or benefits from our proposal have not been measured, we have not got the resources to calculate it.
  4. We have tested releasing 40 hl in some locations and tried to measure results, not enough to have an impact on rain, ( atm moment we are only able to release 40 Hl a day)  we believe what we do could be a solution to some drought-affected area or at least have an impact on rainfall.
  5. The calculation is 10000 HL would seriously have an impact.
  6. But as usual, there is no proactive action to try to resolve the drought issue in Australia, Rather a passive behavior, What we call passive, is purely data analysis, basing it all on climate change, that is correct towards temperatures, seasons, weather patterns. but when it comes to what can be done about it equals zero,

Our plan

  • Find the right locations for our process
  • Increase freshwater production
  • Storage and delivery
  • Marketing price
  • Currently, it is free and falls back to earth in locations that need it.

We have no intention of chasing anybody, to promote what we do, To us, it has become a waiting game, When someone is prepared to look into it, We are here. But at least we will always have fresh water 

We have tried to submit proposals regarding climate change issues, and for every statement that we made, the number of Academically rebuttals came out left right and center. “Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one” evolution is guided by visionaries and not by past history

Where are we going from here

  • Fundraising for expansion
  • accepting donations , At one stage we intend to try to float a newly formed company onto the share market, Our initial idea should that evolve is to issue shares against donations received in recognition of your support, This is will be a tedious process for us since we have no idea about it, but we do need 100 shareholders in our newly formed company, and obviously a prospectus regarding the company activities futures and performance, Traffic safety Inc will retain the controlling interest  at that stage , things may change as time progress

Get involved Towards reducing drought in Australia
[email protected]

Leave a Reply